Due
to social pressure, great strides have been made within the past 50
years to include women and non-whites in the picture of the past.
However, American students still have an extremely warped view of world
history and how it relates to current events because of the way Jews and
Israel are discussed at school, and the way Arabs and Islam are
excluded from mention, even when the topic is ancient Canaan.
I am deeply concerned about my daughter's 6th grade social studies
textbook, which I believe violates the law by teaching Bible history
(Zionist mythology) instead of sticking to the facts when discussing
ancient Canaan and Jewish history. I truly feel like David facing
Goliath when bringing up these issues with the school administration.
The textbook I am concerned about is “History Alive! The Ancient
World” by the Teachers' Curriculum Institute. There are six units: Early
Humans and the Rise of Civilization, which discusses Mesopotamia;
Ancient Egypt and the Middle East, which includes two chapters on
Judaism; Ancient India, which introduces Hinduism and Buddhism; Ancient
China, which discusses Confusionism, Daoism and Legalism; Ancient
Greece, which discusses Democracy and Greek contribution to the modern
world; and Rome, which discusses Christianity and Rome’s legacy in the
modern world.
The chapters present artifacts, archaeological evidence, cultural
traditions and photos of these regions in modern day. They piece
together a scientific understanding of history based on what we know -
all except those relating to Canaan! There is no excuse for this
omission of facts and evidence from the Middle East Section, because
Canaan is full of artifacts, ancient ruins, and traditional culture.
“The narrative doesn't recognize the importance of the actual
geo-political history of the region as part of the indigenous timeline
from Syrian Phoenician Nabatean Arabian 'Judaism' to 'Christianity' and
then to 'Islam' all as part of one continuous history,” notes Oxford
scholar Lilia Patterson.
Instead of a rich discussion on history, the chapters on Canaan
contain only Bible stories told from a radically Judeo-centric
perspective. For example, Abraham is mentioned as the father of Judaism
but the textbook neglects to mention he had two sons, Isaac and Ishmael.
That is why Muslims refer to Jews as their “cousins.” It would have
been so easy to add a statement saying that Arabian historical legends
also date back to Abraham, but this topic is carefully avoided to the
point of absurdity.
Many different people lived in ancient Canaan besides Israelites.
Over time, these many tribes intermarried with each other. Canaanite
scholar Mazin Qumsiyeh explains, “The Palestinians of today, Muslims and
Christians, trace their descent to all the peoples who have lived on
this land from the time of the Canaanites.”
The exclusion of Arabic history from the section on the Middle East
creates a textbook that is not only biased but wildly inaccurate. The
history of Canaan needs to be told in a secular, scientific way based on
archaeological, cultural and linguistic evidence, just like all other
histories are taught. Bible stories are not supposed to be taught as
historical fact. Many paragraphs start with "The Hebrew Bible says..."
(then proceed to misrepresent what the Bible says), while several
actually present legend as fact.
The Jewish connection to the Middle East is presented as a continuum
dating back to the ancient times, ending with their expulsion by the
Romans in the first century after Christ, even though historical
evidence finds no proof of any major migrations. Instead, what has been
found is that most of the descendants of the ancient Israelites accepted
Christianity and eventually embraced Islam.
“Archeologists at Tel Aviv University showed that city states and
kingdoms were routinely made and obliterated in the ancient land of
Canaan while the natives survived and continued to live.” The various
Canaanite groups “lived, fought, interacted and collaborated, but no
group was obliterated in history,” writes Qumsiyeh.
Established by the Jebusites (not by King David) in 3000 BC,
Jerusalem has always been an international city with a multi-ethnic and
multi-religious community. After King Solomon’s death, the majority of
the Israelites no longer considered Jerusalem their capital. Yet, the
textbook refers only to Jerusalem as the Jewish capital of Israel.
The textbook’s discussion of the Temple of Solomon and its
importance to Jews is also completely inadequate because again, it
relies exclusively on Biblical mythology and omits extremely important
facts about the Arab history of the region.
After the Romans expelled the Jews in the 1st century CE, they also
destroyed the Temple of Solomon. All that was left was a small remnant
of a wall. It could barely be seen as the area was used as a garbage
dump.
The first goal of the first Muslim generation after the death of the
Prophet Mohammed in the 7th century CE was to liberate Jerusalem and
rebuild the Temple. Islamic Caliph Umar lifted the ban on Jews living in
Jerusalem for the first time since 70 CE. The new Muslim government and
the Jewish community worked together to clean up the garbage and build a
new house of worship on the Temple Mount, incorporating the Wailing
Wall, which Jews hold sacred. Karen Armstrong writes:
"As soon as the platform had been cleared, Umar summoned Ka'b ibn Ahbar, a Jewish convert to Islam and an expert on the isra'iliyat
or as we would say, "Jewish studies." It came naturally to the Muslims
to consult the Jews about the disposition of the site that had been
sacred to their ancestors. Both the Jewish and Muslim sources make it
clear that Jews took part in the reclamation of the Mount."
When European Crusaders took over Jerusalem, both Muslims and Jews
were persecuted and banished from the city. When Saladin reconquered the
city in the late 12th century, Jews and Muslims were invited back into
the holy city. Jerusalem became known as the “City of Peace” where
Muslims, Christians and Jews could worship freely.
These are important details to omit. Instead of facts, the textbook
dishonestly presents the history of modern-day Israel as the “return” of
exiled Jews to their “homeland.” It is simply wrong to teach two
chapters on Judaism, one chapter on every other religion, but not one
sentence mentioning the Abrahamic origins of Islam. When I complained, I
was told that this is because Islam is not an ancient religion.
However, all of the other chapters attempt to create a picture of
the modern day that relates to the past. Even the chapter on Mesopotamia
includes a photo of modern day Iraq. The textbook includes photos of a
synagogue in Czechoslovakia, and many other scenes of European Jewish
life which, while interesting, have no historical connection to ancient
Canaan whatsoever. Since this Ancient World textbook devotes an entire
chapter to Jews in
modern times, it makes no sense not to mention once that in modern day
Mesopotamia, Syria, Canaan, and Egypt, most people are Muslim or
Christian and they speak Arabic.
Our exposure to information at a
young age sets the tone for all future understanding. This textbook
reflects an outdated, Bible mythology-based world view that is racist,
historically inaccurate and absolutely inappropriate for use in a public
school.
Showing posts with label Palestinian cultural artifacts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palestinian cultural artifacts. Show all posts
Friday, January 18, 2013
Boston Sixth Graders Need a New Textbook on Ancient World History
Labels:
Arabian,
archaeology,
Canaan,
Christianity,
culture,
curriculum,
Islam,
Israel,
Jews,
Muslims,
nabataean,
Palestine,
Palestinian cultural artifacts,
phoenician,
Romans,
ruins,
syrian,
textbook
Sunday, June 07, 2009
Israel Steals Palestinian Heritage, History
Khaleej Times
Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayad has made a formal complaint to the Canadian government regarding the intention of Toronto's Royal Ontario Museum to collaborate with the Israel Antiquities Authority to host "Dead Sea Scrolls: Words that Changed the World" from June 27 to January 3, 2010.
Palestinian Archaeological Department Director-General Hamdan Taha explains,"The exhibition would entail exhibiting or displaying artifacts removed from thePalestinian territories... I think it is important that Canadian institutionswould be responsible and act in accordance with Canada's obligations."
The Israeli exhibition violates international conventions or protocols that Canada has ratified and that protect cultural property during armed conflict.
The State of Israel seized the Jordanian-owned Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem in 1967 to take possession of the scrolls and has continued to loot similar Palestinian cultural property from the Occupied Territories ever since. Under the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property and the 1954 Hague Convention along with its two associated protocols, Canada is legally obliged "to take appropriate steps to recover and return any such cultural property" at the request of the wronged party.
The Dead Sea Scrolls exhibition is part of Israel's effort to re-brand itself.
According to The Economist, American Jewish groups and Israeli diplomats are trying to create the perception of Israel as "hip, cool, cultured, fun and creative." The campaign has included placing sexually suggestive advertisements in Maxim and other men's magazines.
Harvard Professor Stephen Walt suggests in his Foreign Policy blog that the re-branding effort is foredoomed to failure: "Restoring Israel's image in the West isn't a matter of spin or PR or `re-branding;' it's a matter of abandoning the policies that have cost it the sympathy it once enjoyed. It's really just about that simple."
The archaeological component of the propaganda campaign, however, uses subliminal suggestion to bypass such political arguments. A top Israeli re-branding advocate argues, "[Let's] get to that first stage when people associate Israel with science and music and archaeology...Then we'll take it from there."
In Facts on the Ground Columbia Professor Nadia Abu Al Haj writes, "In the context of Israel and Palestine, archaeology emerged as a central scientific discipline because of the manner in which colonial settlement was configured in a language of, and a belief in, Jewish national return." Even though asserting ownership to a country after absence of 2000 years is preposterous, Israel's theft of Palestine from the native population is popularly legitimised through the claim that today's Jews descend from inhabitants of Greco-Roman Judea.
According to New York Times Reporters Ethan Bonner and Isabel Kershner in "Parks Fortify Israel's Claim to Jerusalem," "[There] is a battle for historical legitimacy. As part of the effort, archaeologists are finding indisputable evidence of ancient Jewish life here."
This claim is nonsense.
Intellectuals of Jewish origin in 19th century Germany, influenced by the folk character of German nationalism, invented their folk narratives 'retrospectively,' out of a thirst to create a modern Jewish people, argues Tel Aviv University Professor Shlomo Sand, author of How and When the Jewish People Was Invented.
There is no single founder population for modern Jewry any more than there is a single founder population for modern Christians or modern Muslims. Late ancient and early medieval texts describe an ethnically diverse collection of communities associated with proselytizing pre-Rabbinic Judaism.
In English to use the word Jew is anachronistic before the 10th century when medieval Rabbinic Judaism crystallised thanks to the efforts of Saadyah Gaon (Sa`îd bin Yûsuf al-Fayyûmi) and his colleagues.
With the revolutionary codification of Rabbinic law these communities became part of a vast trade network that spanned the Christian and Muslim world and that extended into China and began to exchange members on a large scale. The main population-exporting region seems to have been located in territories near the Black Sea.
Current genetic anthropological findings based on DNA analysis indicate that the male ancestors of Yiddish Jewry were of Eastern European and non-Levantine Southwest Asian origin while the female ancestors were Eastern Europeans.
Sand admits, "[The] chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I [meaning Israeli Jews] are its descendents."
The Palestinians' ancestors created the Hasmonean Kingdom, composed the Hebrew Bible, followed Jesus, wrote the New Testament, compiled the Mishnah, and redacted the Jerusalem Talmud. The Palestinian people constitute the living link to the earliest beginnings of the heritage from the Torah and Gospel.
Zionists are almost pitiable, for they are so ashamed of their own history that they have usurped one belonging to another people. When the Israeli government sends the Dead Sea Scrolls to Canada, by its own law Canada must turn them over to their rightful owners — the Palestinian people.
Karin Friedemann is a Boston-based writer on Middle East affairs and US politics. She is Director of the Division on Muslim Civil Rights and Liberties for the National Association of Muslim American Women. Joachim Martillo contributed to this article
Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayad has made a formal complaint to the Canadian government regarding the intention of Toronto's Royal Ontario Museum to collaborate with the Israel Antiquities Authority to host "Dead Sea Scrolls: Words that Changed the World" from June 27 to January 3, 2010.
Palestinian Archaeological Department Director-General Hamdan Taha explains,"The exhibition would entail exhibiting or displaying artifacts removed from thePalestinian territories... I think it is important that Canadian institutionswould be responsible and act in accordance with Canada's obligations."
The Israeli exhibition violates international conventions or protocols that Canada has ratified and that protect cultural property during armed conflict.
The State of Israel seized the Jordanian-owned Rockefeller Museum in Jerusalem in 1967 to take possession of the scrolls and has continued to loot similar Palestinian cultural property from the Occupied Territories ever since. Under the 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property and the 1954 Hague Convention along with its two associated protocols, Canada is legally obliged "to take appropriate steps to recover and return any such cultural property" at the request of the wronged party.
The Dead Sea Scrolls exhibition is part of Israel's effort to re-brand itself.
According to The Economist, American Jewish groups and Israeli diplomats are trying to create the perception of Israel as "hip, cool, cultured, fun and creative." The campaign has included placing sexually suggestive advertisements in Maxim and other men's magazines.
Harvard Professor Stephen Walt suggests in his Foreign Policy blog that the re-branding effort is foredoomed to failure: "Restoring Israel's image in the West isn't a matter of spin or PR or `re-branding;' it's a matter of abandoning the policies that have cost it the sympathy it once enjoyed. It's really just about that simple."
The archaeological component of the propaganda campaign, however, uses subliminal suggestion to bypass such political arguments. A top Israeli re-branding advocate argues, "[Let's] get to that first stage when people associate Israel with science and music and archaeology...Then we'll take it from there."
In Facts on the Ground Columbia Professor Nadia Abu Al Haj writes, "In the context of Israel and Palestine, archaeology emerged as a central scientific discipline because of the manner in which colonial settlement was configured in a language of, and a belief in, Jewish national return." Even though asserting ownership to a country after absence of 2000 years is preposterous, Israel's theft of Palestine from the native population is popularly legitimised through the claim that today's Jews descend from inhabitants of Greco-Roman Judea.
According to New York Times Reporters Ethan Bonner and Isabel Kershner in "Parks Fortify Israel's Claim to Jerusalem," "[There] is a battle for historical legitimacy. As part of the effort, archaeologists are finding indisputable evidence of ancient Jewish life here."
This claim is nonsense.
Intellectuals of Jewish origin in 19th century Germany, influenced by the folk character of German nationalism, invented their folk narratives 'retrospectively,' out of a thirst to create a modern Jewish people, argues Tel Aviv University Professor Shlomo Sand, author of How and When the Jewish People Was Invented.
There is no single founder population for modern Jewry any more than there is a single founder population for modern Christians or modern Muslims. Late ancient and early medieval texts describe an ethnically diverse collection of communities associated with proselytizing pre-Rabbinic Judaism.
In English to use the word Jew is anachronistic before the 10th century when medieval Rabbinic Judaism crystallised thanks to the efforts of Saadyah Gaon (Sa`îd bin Yûsuf al-Fayyûmi) and his colleagues.
With the revolutionary codification of Rabbinic law these communities became part of a vast trade network that spanned the Christian and Muslim world and that extended into China and began to exchange members on a large scale. The main population-exporting region seems to have been located in territories near the Black Sea.
Current genetic anthropological findings based on DNA analysis indicate that the male ancestors of Yiddish Jewry were of Eastern European and non-Levantine Southwest Asian origin while the female ancestors were Eastern Europeans.
Sand admits, "[The] chances that the Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Judaic people are much greater than the chances that you or I [meaning Israeli Jews] are its descendents."
The Palestinians' ancestors created the Hasmonean Kingdom, composed the Hebrew Bible, followed Jesus, wrote the New Testament, compiled the Mishnah, and redacted the Jerusalem Talmud. The Palestinian people constitute the living link to the earliest beginnings of the heritage from the Torah and Gospel.
Zionists are almost pitiable, for they are so ashamed of their own history that they have usurped one belonging to another people. When the Israeli government sends the Dead Sea Scrolls to Canada, by its own law Canada must turn them over to their rightful owners — the Palestinian people.
Karin Friedemann is a Boston-based writer on Middle East affairs and US politics. She is Director of the Division on Muslim Civil Rights and Liberties for the National Association of Muslim American Women. Joachim Martillo contributed to this article
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)